Microfinance in Kenya: The Long Game to Scalability

Microfinance in Kenya

In developed countries, the five main objectives of European microfinance are job creation, promoting micro-enterprises, financial and social inclusion, and empowerment of specific target groups. 

Microfinance in developed countries has loan ceilings which above those amounts, there is the option of co-financing.

As many scholars have pointed out, credit alone can’t bring development. It is a combination of things that bring about development.

However, Microfinance mainly in developing countries is largely concerned with scaling their businesses and pay less concern to their impact on society. Some scholars and researchers in the field argue that the reason they rarely concern themselves with the impact is that they want to avoid the costs associated with social welfare.

Data from the Kenya FinAccess Household Survey 2019

“Formal financial inclusion has risen to 82.9 percent, up from 26.7 percent in 2006, while complete exclusion has narrowed to 11.0 percent from 41.3 percent in 2006. 

Furthermore, the disparities in financial access between rich and poor, men and women, and rural and urban areas have also declined remarkably. 

Key drivers of these changes include the growth of mobile money, government initiatives and support, and developments in information and communications technology (ICT).”

Microfinance is often cited as essential in helping women, in particular, to rise from poverty and provide their families with safety nets in finances and advance education levels.

However, despite this optimistic outlook, most credit to women finds its way to pay for emergencies, hospital bills, and therefore, does not go towards boosting their businesses.


The long term effect of this is that while the microfinance has high repayment rates, the people/ communities remain in places of poverty and insecurity in incomes.

The challenges of microfinance as pointed out by Casey Hynes, include borrowers being high-risk borrowers. 

Traditional banking always assesses a customer’s risk and determines if they can repay their loans in full with minimum costs employed towards recovery. 

With the microfinance customers not qualifying for the traditional banking loans, microfinance offers a solution to this. However, high risk dictates high-interest rates. High-interest rates on relatively small loans then put the borrower at a disadvantage.

Microfinance needs to work on longer time scales to help their customers as opposed to focusing on quick scalability and cost-efficiency.

Scalability focus limits the time they allow for substantial economic change to take place.

They should, therefore, give due time and employ resources to helping customers become more financially literate and stable while putting into consideration the cultural factors that have inhibited growth and how to enhance growth.

Microfinance should, therefore, help their borrowers establish their creditworthiness, develop their business and financial skills, as well as understand how to use traditional banking products to their advantage.

Credit is not equal to impact, but credit is an enabler to impact.


This can be achieved through literacy kiosks which are set up to teach the borrowers on financial products. Most borrowers are also not literate, which can be countered by the use of voice-activated services for those who cannot read financial material.

As Casey Hynes notes, Credit is not equal to impact, but credit is an enabler to impact.

Microfinancing, therefore, requires a long view if it is to achieve lasting change in developing countries.